Secrutiny Founder, Simon Crumplin Discusses SOC-as-a-Service at Securing the Law Firm 2019
Last month we had the opportunity to be a part of Securing the Law Firm 2019 with an Education Seminar centred around best-practice for constructing SOC-as-a-Service (SOCaaS), so you know you can get value.
Representing Secrutiny, Founder Simon Crumplin, began the session with the statement: “I want to exaggerate that this is not something where you have to buy technology! This is an approach and a philosophy to achieve incident readiness and SOC and SIEM readiness so you can govern the quality.
Myths and Realities of SOCaaS
Organisations have become unnecessarily exposed to risk, over-reliant (locked-in) and their agility restricted by allowing their SOC and SIEM providers to directly ingest relevant log sources. To remove this reliance and lack of clarity, organisations need to decouple log aggregation from the service provider creating a tow-tier architecture.
- Compliance, assurance and audit requirements
- The transfer of only relevant data for processing and analysis (the SIEM)
- Provides Incident Response data set
- Auditing the service provider
- Ability to change provider or analytics platform at will
- Archive data to any cloud or on-premise service
- Deploy automation and response processes
Without this end-to-end record of all relevant activities, it is impossible to conduct an effective internal or external audit of your SOC or SIEM Service, let alone demonstrate process compliance with a regulator or cyber security insurance underwriter. It is important that security operations teams can easily access system records, meet process requirements, adhere to record retention policies, and generate reports without substantial manual effort.
Noisy SIEMs to Meaningful SOC Alets (Getting SOC Ready)
When discussing being SOC ready, it is essential to also consider being SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) ready as well. It is our experience that most organisations are not.
A SIEM is a powerful tool, but security process maturity can pose as a significant barrier, leaving organisations unable to make the most out of its true potential. In order to be SIEM-ready, the following considerations must be addressed:
- What are the questions that my stakeholders need answers to?
- Where is the data that, if processed, will answer these questions, and how will it be processed?
- How often does each question need to be answered?
- What scale of data needs to be addressed to answer these questions?
- Where does the data live, and where are its original sources for proof?
- Who needs access to the answers or the data, and how?
- Am I reducing risks or increasing risks with how I manage and present the data?
The System of Record is intended to provide a verifiable source of data in its original format. This is to enable auditors of the SIEM or related data systems to verify the accuracy and completeness of reporting, as well as to produce when required, the original logs in an appropriate forensic manner. To be SIEM-ready, the system architecture must consider the questions noted above and be constructed to collect, process, and answer the questions efficiently.
The next step to getting SOC ready is to identify the information feeds you will input into your SOC. It depends on the kind of services you are running but should cover the full scope of the Mitre Attack Framework.
SOC reporting should be configured by business unit/function and risk category (Build, Services, Network, User and Data). Allowing devices, teams, departments and processes to be rationally assessed to establish not only the likelihood of being exploited but crucially what the impact to the business will be. It broadens the scope beyond cyber threat detection to help focus on cyber risks in business context.
Not all SOCaaS Offerings Are the Same (How to Evaluate SOCaaS Providers)
There are two types of Managed Security Service Provider’s (MSSPs) that offer SOCaaS. Many are just the messenger, passing on the alerts and leaving you to deal with them. Others provide an end-to-end service, managing the alerts with full investigation so that when the issue is raised, it already needs your attention.
There are three fundamental aspects to SOCaaS:
What is the baseline?
You don’t need fancy AI, just good posture and hygiene
Determin what is normal and what is visible
Who is allowed to do what, when and how?
Runbooks & Playbooks
Determine what you are responsible for:
Who does what when incidents occur?
Not all incidents require a technical response
Most people stop at telemetry data and never get to rich data
System Access, Database Access, Data Access
“But even so, all SOCaaS solutions are different, from what degree they provide products, people and process to solve the problem, to the layers of defence within scope. How it is deployed and maintained, as well as how responsibilities are aligned between vendor and customer,” continued Simon.
An effective and fully operational SOC will improve security incident detection and increase your cyber resiliency. Frequently verifying the SOCaaS, through such exercises as red teaming, breach and attack simulation, audit or internal penetration testing is a must.
Check Out Our Other Recent Posts >
Explore the impact and fundamental value of the MITRE ATT&CK framework with Secrutiny Founder, Simon Crumplin and MITRE expert, Jared Phipps on February 27.
With only a couple of weeks to go until we release our 2020 cybersecurity predictions, we took a look back over last year’s predictions to see just how accurate we were.
Last month we had the opportunity to be a part of Securing the Law Firm 2019 with an Education Seminar centred around best-practice for constructing SOC-as-a-Service (SOCaaS), so you know you can get value; here’s the low-down.